seventy seven . Const. P. 3670/2023 (D.B.) Rehan Pervez V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi First and foremost, we would address the issue of maintainability of the moment Petition under Article 199 in the Constitution based over the doctrine of laches as this petition was filed in 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued for the petitioner in 1992. The petitioner asserts that he pursued his legal remedy just after involvement inside the FIR lodged by FIA and while in the intervening period the respondent dismissed him from service where after he preferred petition No.
Its enforcement with the provision of capital punishment or life imprisonment underscores the value of human life and the importance of maintaining legislation and order in society.
Therefore, this petition is found to get not maintainable and is particularly dismissed along with the pending application(s), as well as petitioners may perhaps search for remedies through the civil court process as discussed supra. Read more
To report technical problems with our Website, please contact the webmaster. The webmaster will not respond to inquiries seeking legal assistance or specific cases. Questions regarding specific cases should be directed towards the court in which the case has become or will be filed.
ninety four . Const. P. 256/2025 (D.B.) Hafeezullah V/S Govt of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It's very well-settled that the civil servants must first pursue internal appeals within ninety days. If your appeal isn't decided within that timeframe, he/she can then tactic the service tribunal to challenge the original order. Once they are doing so, the Tribunal must decide the appeal on merits and cannot merely direct the department to decide it, given that the 90 days for the department to act has already expired. On the aforesaid proposition, we're guided with the decision with the Supreme Court in the case of Dr.
کیا ایف آئی آر درخواست گزار کی رپورٹ پر درج کی گئی تھی اور اگر ہاں تو کیا اسے اس کے خلاف ثبوت کے طور پر استعمال کیا جا سکتا ہے؟
In this case, the Supreme Court of Pakistan upheld the death penalty to the accused who intentionally murdered the sufferer.
The court cannot hear the transfer order challenge mainly because it falls within the terms and conditions of service. Regarding the quo warranto writ, the petitioner must file a separate petition to challenge the private respondents' appointment orders preserving in view that one of several respondents has retired from service as pointed out with the counsel for the respondent university. twelve. The petition and applications pending therein stand dismissed with no order concerning costs. Read more
Pakistani legal citations typically include the year, court, and case number. Familiarizing yourself with this format will help you quickly Track down the cases you need. Numerous free case regulation websites allow you to search directly using citations.
If granted absolute immunity, the parties would not only be protected from liability during the matter, but couldn't be answerable in any way for their actions. When the court delayed making such a ruling, the defendants took their request towards the appellate court.
Finally, an important contribution of this case which was accepted for consideration with the Court under Article 184 (3), has been setting a precedent which allows for much simpler access for the public to strategy the superior courts as well as subordinate courts on environment related issues.
In order to prove murder, there needs to be an intention to cause the death of that person along with the action of actually injuring them – and that injury subsequently leading to and causing the death of that person.
Because of this, merely citing the case is more prone to annoy a judge than help the party’s case. Visualize it as calling someone to tell them you’ve found their misplaced phone, then telling them you get more info live in this sort of-and-this sort of neighborhood, without actually giving them an address. Driving throughout the neighborhood attempting to find their phone is likely to become more frustrating than it’s worth.
In 1996, the Nevada Division of Child and Family Services (“DCFS”) removed a twelve-year previous boy from his home to protect him from the Awful physical and sexual abuse he had suffered in his home, also to prevent him from abusing other children while in the home. The boy was placed in an crisis foster home, and was later shifted all over within the foster care system.